Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. Image:Shiningforce1box.jpg is being used on this article. We appreciate your opinion, but Wikipedia's not the place for yours or anyone else's.ĬatMan 22:32, 29 June 2007 (UTC) Reply I would agree with you, though there are several characters with high potential to be the strongest, and thus, none should be given that title in the article. I think Zylo is the most powerful man/wolf in the whole game he is so amazing and he could kick the main mans butt any day that is what i believe Murlocman 21:09, (UTC)murlocman Reply įirst of all, thank you for noticing. I didn't dare to change it, though, since I am not sure and I lack the motivation to replay the game only to test it, so hopefully someone of you can back me up on this. If you train him enough he will be the most powerful member of them all. The article say this about Zylo "As a warwolf, Zylo fights unarmed, yet he is the most powerful member of the force given plenty of training.", yet as far as I know, Max is the character with the best potential. The descriptions about the characters aren't very accurate, but especially one thing caught my eye. There also have been some recent comments about the character section, and the battle-by-battle explanation of the story. Some minor punctuation errors, too (such as a lack of a period at the end, and a comma after "Shining Force: Resurrection of the Dark Dragon"). I don't know if it's just me, but the sentences sound rather fragmented. Max and his "Shining Force" are going to become the last hope of good and fight fiercely against Dark Dragon and his followers" Hordes of evil monsters were cast into the land. "As the people have forgotten about him, they are unprepared for the invasion. An example would be the end of the first paragraph: And, some of the writing feels a bit weak. Yes, I believe this article needs some reworking. Thoughts? NighTrekr 01:15, 3 January 2007 (UTC) Reply I think at the very least we should trim the plot section down to a few paragraphs per chapter (none of this battle-by-battle stuff) and cut down the character info to a general description (removing the stats and spells). It's crawling with weasley, POV statements and judgements about the game, the plot and character sections are unnecessarily lengthy and there's far too much gameplay information. Some time needs to be spent fixing up the page if you look near the bottom, there's some really terrible descriptions and grammatical errors. Any objections to getting rid of them? NighTrekr 00:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC) Reply I completely agree with the above- I did some editing a few months back, but it's still pretty bad. I'm not sure we need the animated portraits either. Stallyn 16:38, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Reply The character section is horribly POV and needs a lot of work. This is overall just a biased article and will have to have some major reworking. Depending on the leveling, characters can end up quite differently on each playthrough. Nifboy 19:21, 24 June 2006 (UTC) Reply Especially because stats in this game are very random to be able to make definite statements. Since Wikipedia is not a strategy guide, I would venture to say that covers character stats as well. I feel most other character descriptions may need some touch-up as well. "In the Megadrive/Genesis version, he is extremely useful because of his incredible HP, and still quite good later on, even though his other stats are only useless however, his stat growths have been significantly changed in the GBA version, making him a weaker character." Anyone think the entire addition should just be removed? It's the following: The extra entry at the end of Ken's character description seems unnecessary and superfluous to Wikipedia-not to mention biased (I changed it from "horrible" to "weaker" to reduce this).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |